© 2007 Stephen PittAMERICAblog
Joe Lieberman thinks the Iraq insurgents and Syria blew up the World Trade Center
That isn't just an outright lie, it's insane. That's a bigger lie than anything Dick Cheney has even said. Syria had nothing to do with September 11. Neither did Saddam Hussein or the folks fighting the civil war in Iraq. It's just delusional to suggest otherwise - George Bush hasn't even had the nerve to say anything that absurdly untrue. I'm increasingly wondering whose side Joe Lieberman is really on, because his insane ramblings about Iraq and the Middle East are clearly not in America's interests.
ThinkProgress has the video.
.
Hi S-Q and no, crazy Joe has nothing for American interests. That Stephen Pitt is classic!! LOL
ReplyDeleteI'm increasingly wondering whose side Joe Lieberman is really on, because his insane ramblings about Iraq and the Middle East are clearly not in America's interests.
ReplyDelete-----------------
Well, I have to agree with John A. here...I am wondering too..
Hi Prissy!
ReplyDeleteHow are ya? Having a nice Sunday? ;)
Lieberman sold out to Bush when he lost the primary because he was pushing Bush's war.
ReplyDeleteLieberman is a neocon and he has no scruples over what his sell-out has cost innocent people.
Hi Larry:
ReplyDeleteYep, LIEberman is a neocon..and I think he was involved in Enron, as well...correct me if I'm wrong on that.
SQ,
ReplyDeleteYou are right on Enron as well. Lieberman may as well take Gonzo's spot since he is for everything Bush does.
Prissy:
ReplyDeleteCheck out Lydia's blog.. go on her site and you can get to her blog from there. She's very nice! ;)
Larry:
ReplyDeleteYep and the Governator of Kalifornia is in that Enron mess too...
Larry:
ReplyDeleteLIEberman is nuttier than a fruitcake! LOL
Lieberman goes on TV acting like a poor misunderstood soul, because his party is against him.
ReplyDeleteLicking on Bush's ear for 6 years had to make somebody sick.
Look at all the "upper neocons" who were involved in Enron.
ReplyDeleteAll at the expense of struggling people.
Licking on Bush's ear for 6 years had to make somebody sick.
ReplyDelete---------------
Larry:
Yes it made the Dems sick alright! The neocons took him in open arms though because he is one of them! Bleh!
SQ,
ReplyDeleteBush and Lieberman deserve each other. Both are losers, both are sell-outs, both are corrupt, and both have no idea what to do tomorrow.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteThere are people lined up everyday at labor centers hoping for one days work.
ReplyDeleteThe wealthiest nation in the world has men, women and children living under bridges tonight.
The homeless rate of veterans are at an all time high.
But Exxon still made records profits last year.
The homeless rate of veterans are at an all time high.
ReplyDelete----------------
Larry:
It's just shameful that this country has homeless people while the big oil companies are raking in record profits! Disgusting!
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteBush resides over the worst economic mess since the depression, and is doing nothing about it.
ReplyDeleteLarry:
ReplyDeleteHave you posted on Cliff's blog lately? I haven't been posting there for a couple of days.. and I meant to do so earlier but will try to tonight. ;)
SQ,
ReplyDeleteI Posted at Cliff's twice today but I was the only one. Must be the holidays.
Lieberman is a Neo Con incognito or a repug lite.............I have never liked him, in fact HE is the main reason I didnt vote for Gore in 2000.........................but i'd love for Gore to Run NOW, I think he could win big and would be a good president.
ReplyDeletei'd Love to see a Gore/Richardson or even a Gore/Obama ticket!
Chris Matthews says Gore has a trainer who is supposed to help him lose 80 pounds.
ReplyDeleteLarry:
ReplyDeleteYep, I'm sure it's because of the holiday.
Mike:
ReplyDeleteWhat about Gore/Edwards? Or Edwards/Obama?
Cliff came to Lydia's blog and commented a couple of times but he usually doesn't comment there.
ReplyDeleteI hope Edwards wins the whole thing.
ReplyDeleteLarry:
ReplyDeleteI really like Edwards and Obama. Gore is good too but I seriously doubt that he will run, however, he is doing a a fantastic job on the climate change agenda. ;)
SQ,
ReplyDeleteI don't think Gore will run either. I wouldn't if I was him.
I was at a dinner in December and Edwards was there, sat at my table and was down to earth.
He would be better for working people.
Larry:
ReplyDeleteI've heard that from several people about Edwards. I do think he would be a great President! :)
I would like and support Gore/Edwards as well.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteJude of Iddybud Journal is a friend of Edwards and sings his praises.
ReplyDeleteI like Edwards, he says alot of things I like.......but I think him and Obama need experience as a VP before making a serious run.
ReplyDeleteAlso I have a little trouble getting past Edwards voting for the war........like I said, I like Edwards and support most of his positions and I know most of the Dems voted for the war as well..........but I see it as either using poor judgement or being weak willed and allowing yourself to be intimidated and caving in to pressure.
I KNEW the Evidence and push for war was bogus.......and I expect my President to be at least as smart as me and to question baseless evidence and empty rhetoric lacking solid facts and investigate something that serious rather than just taking the easy route and caving in to intimidation and pressure from bullies.
In other words I expect a president to be curious and search for the truth and not take the easy way or the path of least resistance particularly when the stakes are high.
That said I think A VP role would be a perfect opportunity for Edwards or many others to gain experience and redeem themselves.
I doubt Edwards would take VP again since he didn't get it before but you never know.
ReplyDeleteJude of Iddybud Journal
ReplyDelete------------
Larry:
I don't know who that is? Is it a blog?
Same with Russ Feingold I like him, he says a lot of things I like,,,,,,,,,,,I like his movement to impeach Bush...............BUT I have a little dificulty with him saying we should just make Bush's illegal warrantless spying on Americans program legal.............anyone would could just say to rubberstamp an illegal unconstitutional power Grab by a megalomaniac wannabe dictator run amuk has questionable judgement in my book.
ReplyDeleteThat is a blog. Lydia has it on her links page.
ReplyDeleteThey make Feingold look like a lamebrain so they don't have to listen to what he says.
ReplyDeleteLarry said "I was at a dinner in December and Edwards was there, sat at my table and was down to earth.
ReplyDeleteHe would be better for working people."
I agree Larry!
Bill Mayer will be on Imus Tuesday if you can see it.
ReplyDeleteBoth hate Bush. Should be good TV.
Larry:
ReplyDeleteI'll check out that link on Lydia's blog. I put Lydia's link on my blog.. is my link on hers yet?
SQ,
ReplyDeleteYour link isn't on hers yet but she is slow about that. She has two sons plus all the other things she does.
She'll get it there. I'll remind her.
That's an interesting blog. ;)
ReplyDeleteNo problem Larry, but I was just looking around at her links.
BUT I have a little dificulty with him saying we should just make Bush's illegal warrantless spying on Americans program legal.
ReplyDelete-----------
Mike:
Feingold said that? I'm shocked!
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteFeingold has always been against the war, why would he be for wiretapping?
ReplyDeleteJoe has probably been blessed with the same chip that is installed on the newer cell phones. The Gorporate Coverment can hear everything near him, and they know where he is, but unlike a phone he can't remove his batteries.
ReplyDeleteNeedless to mention he doesn't speak for himself and damned well better toe the mark...Heehehehe
He sounds like Bush. Bush can't speak for himself either.
ReplyDeleteHey Geezer:
ReplyDeleteDid you find any eggs? hehe
Larry:
ReplyDeleteDo you guys post on Americablog? I just posted a few posts on Cliff's blog and thought I'd jump over to the Americablog for a few posts too. Nice folks over there. ;)
SQ,
ReplyDeleteI have before but not a regular. Clif is there alot. Kayinmaine is there quite a bit.
Larry;
ReplyDeleteI'm a newbie there. Just started posting 1-2 weeks ago. ;)
SQ,
ReplyDeleteThey have a lot of traffic and a lot of troll problem on occasions but it is a popular place.
Larry said...
ReplyDeleteFeingold has always been against the war, why would he be for wiretapping?"
I asked that same exact question, in fact it was about a year ago that we were discussing this very issue as it broke around Easter I believe.............and I was in shock when I heard feingold said that as he was essentially the first to show the courage to call for Bush's impeachment.
I don't see why he is against the war but for that.
ReplyDeleteMakes no sense.
Exactly, it doesn't make sense. Did you hear it or read it Mike?
ReplyDeleteI mean what was your source Mike?
ReplyDeleteIt seems to me if he supports that he may as well support the war.
ReplyDeleteAt least he is for impeachment.
Joe doesn't qualify for the advanced chip like Duhbya has with a speech module and stereo ear devices. Information on the duhbya chip is highly classified.
ReplyDeleteLink
Early morning tomorrow...
ReplyDeleteGood Night you guys! ;)
Sweet Dreams, SQ
ReplyDeleteAbout Feingold
ReplyDeleteI was looking at senate statements where Feingold spoke out against wiretapping....
Goognight...zzzzzzzZZZZZZZZ
ReplyDelete