by Basheert @4:35 PM MDT
Just to fling this out and see if anyone can answer this for me. Within those thousands of pages of emails, it was shown that many involved were utilizing outside email addresses at the domain site owned by the RNC. Is email using outside web servers protected by Executive Privilege? If you utilize an external email address, can you claim Privilege once it leaves a secure server?
I genuinely would like an opinion on this issue, from someone who might actually know how this might work.
I understand that Yahoo and Hotmail were also used as external email servers. How can that information be privileged if it is held on a server that is not internally controlled and the information could be available to their IT people?
HELP please?
Showing posts with label executive privilege. Show all posts
Showing posts with label executive privilege. Show all posts
Tuesday, March 27, 2007
Thursday, March 22, 2007
E-mails On Attorneys’ Firings Could Impact Privilege Case
by S-Q @ 6:00 PM MDT
The Hill
The Hill
By Susan Crabtree | |
March 22, 2007 | |
As the White House prepares for a constitutional showdown over subpoenas of top administration aides to testify about the firings of U.S. attorneys, the viability of President Bush’s executive privilege argument may come down to the time-worn question: How much did the president know, and when did he know it? Democratic sources say that investigators in Congress have taken note of a brief e-mail exchange, released by the administration Monday night, which touches on this topic. But the exchange raises more questions than it answers. In an e-mail dated Nov. 15, 2006, Kyle Sampson, former chief of staff to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, asked then-White House Counsel Harriet Miers and her deputy, William Kelley, whether he had the green light to go forward with the firing plan. Miers responded that she was “not sure whether this will be determined to require the boss’s attention.” Her e-mail ended with the words: “We will see. Thanks.” Sampson, who resigned last week, responded with a critical question: “Who will determine whether whether [sic] this requires the President’s attention?” |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)